<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Comparison of Numbers vs. Excel/Google Spreadsheet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/</link>
	<description>Coding, Security, and maybe a little bit about Damon Cortesi</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Powers that be</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-52291</link>
		<dc:creator>Powers that be</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-52291</guid>
		<description>It's because of the different format of the text copied between Safari and Firefox. Firefox copies them with a tab between cells on the row (one row per line), Safari a combination of linebreaks and spaces. Firefox is definitely the one to use if you are converting tabular data to a spreadsheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because of the different format of the text copied between Safari and Firefox. Firefox copies them with a tab between cells on the row (one row per line), Safari a combination of linebreaks and spaces. Firefox is definitely the one to use if you are converting tabular data to a spreadsheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44990</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44990</guid>
		<description>Ah, igor, you're right!  How silly of me not to try in multiple browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, igor, you&#8217;re right!  How silly of me not to try in multiple browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igor</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44987</link>
		<dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44987</guid>
		<description>Sorry - I meant "described" not "prescribed"...

How ever - upon submitting my comment I got a big fat error message from your blog - something about a header not beeing okay... just thought you would like to know about that too... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry - I meant &#8220;described&#8221; not &#8220;prescribed&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>How ever - upon submitting my comment I got a big fat error message from your blog - something about a header not beeing okay&#8230; just thought you would like to know about that too&#8230; <img src='http://dcortesi.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igor</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44986</link>
		<dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44986</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm -  just tried it myself with Numbers :

Done exactly the way you prescribed above:  Apple-C then Apple-V (using Firefox 2.0.0.4) works like a charm...

Now the interesting thing: tried again with Safari this time - got &lt;b&gt;your&lt;/b&gt; result, respectively it did not work... does that help?

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm -  just tried it myself with Numbers :</p>
<p>Done exactly the way you prescribed above:  Apple-C then Apple-V (using Firefox 2.0.0.4) works like a charm&#8230;</p>
<p>Now the interesting thing: tried again with Safari this time - got <b>your</b> result, respectively it did not work&#8230; does that help?</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44980</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44980</guid>
		<description>where can i get the list of codes like jump 15 min forward?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where can i get the list of codes like jump 15 min forward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44067</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44067</guid>
		<description>Hi William,
Would you mind posting a quick description of the steps you took?  I simply went to the source page, highlighted the table, switched to Numbers and pressed Ctrl+v.  You can see the results of my test in a couple &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dcortesi/tags/numbersvsexcelgoogle/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Flickr photos&lt;/a&gt; that I posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi William,<br />
Would you mind posting a quick description of the steps you took?  I simply went to the source page, highlighted the table, switched to Numbers and pressed Ctrl+v.  You can see the results of my test in a couple <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dcortesi/tags/numbersvsexcelgoogle/" rel="nofollow">Flickr photos</a> that I posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44058</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcortesi.com/2007/09/06/quick-comparison-of-numbers-vs-excelgoogle-spreadsheet/#comment-44058</guid>
		<description>well, out of curiosity i attempted to replicate what you did with no success.  i dont know what you did but copying and pasting the table that you had a link for in your acticle turned out exactly the way it should have looked.  so i think you should retry your test instead of posting this misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, out of curiosity i attempted to replicate what you did with no success.  i dont know what you did but copying and pasting the table that you had a link for in your acticle turned out exactly the way it should have looked.  so i think you should retry your test instead of posting this misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

